Independent lawyer rankingsEvery fact traceable to a sourcePayment never changes a ranking
LexRanked
Menu

Guardianship

Top-Ranked Guardianship Lawyers in Melbourne, Florida

Updated Methodology LexRank v1.214 lawyers rankedReviewed by LexRanked editorial team

Summary

As of November 1, 2026, the top-ranked guardianship lawyers in Melbourne, Florida are Charles Ian Nash (LexRank 77.60), William Arthur Johnson (77.33) and Robert Joseph Naberhaus III (77.33).

This ranking lists 14 guardianship lawyers in Melbourne, Florida, in order of their LexRank score, calculated from their Florida Bar records and other cited sources. Their experience ranges from 4 to 46 years in practice. 1 of the 14 lists Spanish on their Florida Bar profile.

Lawyers ranked
14
Fully verified
14 of 14

The ranking

Ordered by organic LexRank score; paid placements are labelled and never affect a position. How we rank

  1. No change

    Charles Ian Nash

    Independent practice · Melbourne, FL

    Verified
    • 46 years experience
    • Estate Planning · Guardianship
    • Bar status verified
    View profile
    Why #1?

    Ranks #1 with 77.60: strongest in Experience (30/30) and Reputation (4/20).

    Strongest

    • Experience 30/30 (ranking avg 23.2)
    • Reputation 4/20 (ranking avg 1.4)

    Not on record (scores 0, never estimated): website.

  2. No change

    William Arthur Johnson

    Independent practice · Melbourne, FL

    Verified
    • 35 years experience
    • Elder Law · Guardianship
    • Bar status verified
    View profile
    Why #2?

    Ranks #2 with 77.33: strongest in Experience (30/30) and Reputation (4/20); held back by Practice-area relevance (13.3/20). 0.27 points behind #1, mostly practice-area relevance.

    Strongest

    • Experience 30/30 (ranking avg 23.2)
    • Reputation 4/20 (ranking avg 1.4)

    Held back by

    • Practice-area relevance 13.3/20 (ranking avg 15.2)

    0.27 points behind #1 (Charles Ian Nash): Practice-area relevance −1.7.

  3. No change

    Robert Joseph Naberhaus III

    Independent practice · Melbourne, FL

    Verified
    • 25 years experience
    • Estate Planning · Guardianship
    • Bar status verified
    View profile
    Why #3?

    Ranks #3 with 77.33: strongest in Experience (30/30) and Reputation (4/20); held back by Practice-area relevance (13.3/20).

    Strongest

    • Experience 30/30 (ranking avg 23.2)
    • Reputation 4/20 (ranking avg 1.4)

    Held back by

    • Practice-area relevance 13.3/20 (ranking avg 15.2)
  4. No change

    David Conrad Netzley II “Dave”

    Independent practice · Melbourne, FL

    Verified
    • 28 years experience
    • Guardianship · Probate Litigation
    • Bar status verified
    View profile
    Why #4?

    Ranks #4 with 75.00: strongest in Experience (30/30) and Data quality (10/10); held back by Reputation (0/20). 2.33 points behind #3, mostly reputation.

    Strongest

    • Experience 30/30 (ranking avg 23.2)
    • Data quality 10/10 (ranking avg 9.6)

    Held back by

    • Reputation 0/20 (ranking avg 1.4)

    2.33 points behind #3 (Robert Joseph Naberhaus III): Reputation −4.

  5. No change

    Michelle Stein Spira “Michelle”

    Independent practice · Melbourne, FL

    Verified
    • 25 years experience
    • Guardianship · Probate Litigation
    • Bar status verified
    View profile
    Why #5?

    Ranks #5 with 75.00: strongest in Experience (30/30) and Data quality (10/10); held back by Reputation (0/20).

    Strongest

    • Experience 30/30 (ranking avg 23.2)
    • Data quality 10/10 (ranking avg 9.6)

    Held back by

    • Reputation 0/20 (ranking avg 1.4)
  6. No change

    Pierre Anthony Lothar Mommers

    Independent practice · Melbourne, FL

    Verified
    • 30 years experience
    • Guardianship · Probate Litigation
    • Bar status verified
    View profile
    Why #6?

    Ranks #6 with 73.60: strongest in Experience (30/30) and Local relevance (5/5); held back by Reputation (0/20). 1.40 points behind #5, mostly data quality.

    Strongest

    • Experience 30/30 (ranking avg 23.2)
    • Local relevance 5/5 (ranking avg 5)

    Held back by

    • Reputation 0/20 (ranking avg 1.4)

    1.40 points behind #5 (Michelle Stein Spira “Michelle”): Data quality −1.4.

    Not on record (scores 0, never estimated): website.

  7. No change

    Gregory John Schwendeman

    Independent practice · Melbourne, FL

    Verified
    • 24 years experience
    • Guardianship · Probate Litigation
    • Bar status verified
    View profile
    Why #7?

    Ranks #7 with 72.40: strongest in Experience (28.8/30) and Local relevance (5/5); held back by Reputation (0/20). 1.20 points behind #6, mostly experience.

    Strongest

    • Experience 28.8/30 (ranking avg 23.2)
    • Local relevance 5/5 (ranking avg 5)

    Held back by

    • Reputation 0/20 (ranking avg 1.4)

    1.20 points behind #6 (Pierre Anthony Lothar Mommers): Experience −1.2.

    Not on record (scores 0, never estimated): website.

  8. No change

    Amy Beth Van Fossen

    Independent practice · Melbourne, FL

    Verified
    • 22 years experience
    • Guardianship · Probate Litigation
    • Bar status verified
    View profile
    Why #8?

    Ranks #8 with 71.40: strongest in Experience (26.4/30) and Data quality (10/10); held back by Reputation (0/20). 1.00 points behind #7, mostly experience.

    Strongest

    • Experience 26.4/30 (ranking avg 23.2)
    • Data quality 10/10 (ranking avg 9.6)

    Held back by

    • Reputation 0/20 (ranking avg 1.4)

    1.00 points behind #7 (Gregory John Schwendeman): Experience −2.4.

  9. No change

    Ruth Celia Rhodes

    Independent practice · Melbourne, FL

    Verified
    • 20 years experience
    • Elder Law · Guardianship
    • Bar status verified
    View profile
    Why #9?

    Ranks #9 with 71.33: strongest in Reputation (4/20) and Data quality (10/10); held back by Practice-area relevance (13.3/20). 0.07 points behind #8, mostly experience.

    Strongest

    • Reputation 4/20 (ranking avg 1.4)
    • Data quality 10/10 (ranking avg 9.6)

    Held back by

    • Practice-area relevance 13.3/20 (ranking avg 15.2)

    0.07 points behind #8 (Amy Beth Van Fossen): Experience −2.4, Practice-area relevance −1.7.

  10. No change

    Taylor Keith Hughes

    Independent practice · Melbourne, FL

    Verified
    • 13 years experience
    • Guardianship
    • Bar status verified
    View profile
    Why #10?

    Ranks #10 with 65.60: strongest in Practice-area relevance (20/20) and Data quality (10/10); held back by Reputation (0/20) and Experience (15.6/30). 5.73 points behind #9, mostly experience.

    Strongest

    • Practice-area relevance 20/20 (ranking avg 15.2)
    • Data quality 10/10 (ranking avg 9.6)

    Held back by

    • Reputation 0/20 (ranking avg 1.4)
    • Experience 15.6/30 (ranking avg 23.2)

    5.73 points behind #9 (Ruth Celia Rhodes): Experience −8.4, Reputation −4.

  11. No change

    John Mason Williams IV “Mason”

    Independent practice · Melbourne, FL

    Verified
    • 14 years experience
    • Guardianship · Probate Litigation
    • Bar status verified
    View profile
    Why #11?

    Ranks #11 with 61.80: strongest in Data quality (10/10) and Local relevance (5/5); held back by Reputation (0/20) and Experience (16.8/30). 3.80 points behind #10, mostly practice-area relevance.

    Strongest

    • Data quality 10/10 (ranking avg 9.6)
    • Local relevance 5/5 (ranking avg 5)

    Held back by

    • Reputation 0/20 (ranking avg 1.4)
    • Experience 16.8/30 (ranking avg 23.2)

    3.80 points behind #10 (Taylor Keith Hughes): Practice-area relevance −5.

  12. No change

    Tyler Grant Puttick

    Independent practice · Melbourne, FL

    Verified
    • 12 years experience
    • Guardianship · Probate Litigation
    • Bar status verified
    View profile
    Why #12?

    Ranks #12 with 60.33: strongest in Reputation (4/20) and Local relevance (5/5); held back by Experience (14.4/30) and Practice-area relevance (13.3/20). 1.47 points behind #11, mostly experience.

    Strongest

    • Reputation 4/20 (ranking avg 1.4)
    • Local relevance 5/5 (ranking avg 5)

    Held back by

    • Experience 14.4/30 (ranking avg 23.2)
    • Practice-area relevance 13.3/20 (ranking avg 15.2)

    1.47 points behind #11 (John Mason Williams IV “Mason”): Experience −2.4, Practice-area relevance −1.7, Data quality −1.4.

    Not on record (scores 0, never estimated): website.

  13. No change

    Kelly Marie Keene

    Independent practice · Melbourne, FL

    Verified
    • 12 years experience
    • Guardianship · Probate Litigation
    • Bar status verified
    View profile
    Why #13?

    Ranks #13 with 59.40: strongest in Data quality (10/10) and Local relevance (5/5); held back by Reputation (0/20) and Experience (14.4/30). 0.93 points behind #12, mostly reputation.

    Strongest

    • Data quality 10/10 (ranking avg 9.6)
    • Local relevance 5/5 (ranking avg 5)

    Held back by

    • Reputation 0/20 (ranking avg 1.4)
    • Experience 14.4/30 (ranking avg 23.2)

    0.93 points behind #12 (Tyler Grant Puttick): Reputation −4.

  14. No change

    Rebecca Kristina Stoltenberg “Becca”

    Independent practice · Melbourne, FL

    Verified
    • 4 years experience
    • Guardianship
    • Bar status verified
    View profile
    Why #14?

    Ranks #14 with 54.80: strongest in Practice-area relevance (20/20) and Data quality (10/10); held back by Reputation (0/20) and Experience (4.8/30). 4.60 points behind #13, mostly experience.

    Strongest

    • Practice-area relevance 20/20 (ranking avg 15.2)
    • Data quality 10/10 (ranking avg 9.6)

    Held back by

    • Reputation 0/20 (ranking avg 1.4)
    • Experience 4.8/30 (ranking avg 23.2)

    4.60 points behind #13 (Kelly Marie Keene): Experience −9.6.

Data sources behind the scores

Every score on this page is calculated from facts backed by these sources. Each profile shows which source supports which fact and when it was last checked.

  • floridabar.org · Official / regulatory · 14 profile pages146 facts for 14 lawyers

Guardianship market in Melbourne

LexRanked tracks 14 lawyers in guardianship law in Melbourne, Florida. 14 of the lawyers have verified professional data. Data verified October 30, 2026.

Lawyers
14
Law firms
0
Verified professional data
14 of 14
Average rating
Withheldtoo few sourced ratings
Median review count
Withheldtoo few sourced counts
Median experience
23 years14 lawyers

Calculated by LexRanked from its own records on ; data verified . Ratings and review counts count only when backed by a source; figures from fewer than three profiles are withheld. All lawyers in Melbourne

What sets these Melbourne lawyers apart

Every lawyer in this ranking has a The Florida Bar license verified as eligible to practice, and every fact shown links to its source. The figures below come from each lawyer's Florida Bar profile.

Fact about the 14 ranked lawyers Figure
Years in practice 4 to 46 (median 23)
Languages besides English German (1), Spanish (1)
License status with The Florida Bar Eligible to practice, verified for every lawyer
Most common law school Barry University Dwayne O. Andreas School of Law (4 lawyers)

Who is included in this ranking?

Lawyers eligible to practice in Florida, with a Melbourne office address and guardianship as a practice area on record. It compares 14 guardianship lawyers, using only facts with a cited source. The Florida Bar does not board-certify lawyers in guardianship, so the practice area is the one each lawyer lists on their Florida Bar profile, which The Florida Bar does not review. How we rank.

Florida rules to know

A Florida guardianship starts with a verified petition to determine incapacity, and the court-appointed guardian must report to the court within 60 days and file a plan every year; the ward keeps rights such as yearly review and restoration as soon as possible.

Rule What it means
Petition Any adult may file a verified petition to determine that a person is incapacitated (Fla. Stat. § 744.3201)
Who may serve A Florida resident 18 or older; a nonresident only if related to the ward as the statute lists (§ 744.309)
Disqualification A person convicted of a felony may not serve as guardian (§ 744.309(3))
Initial report The guardian files an inventory or initial plan within 60 days after letters of guardianship are signed (§ 744.362)
Annual plan A guardian of the person files an annual guardianship plan within 90 days after the anniversary month (§ 744.367)
Rights kept The ward keeps rights including an annual review, continuing review of restrictions and restoration to capacity at the earliest possible time (§ 744.3215)
Court Where cases are heard
State court circuit Brevard County is in Florida's Eighteenth Judicial Circuit

How to choose among these lawyers

Confirm the license, ask who will handle your matter, and get the fee terms in writing before you sign.

  1. Look up the lawyer in The Florida Bar's directory and check the bar number shown on their LexRanked profile.
  2. Ask whether the lawyer you meet will handle your matter personally, and how many matters like yours they have handled recently.
  3. Ask how they charge and what costs are extra, and get the agreement in writing.
  4. If you prefer to work in another language, check the languages listed on each profile.

Further reading

Sources for the rules above

Frequently asked questions

Who can file for guardianship in Florida?

Any adult may file a verified petition to determine that a person is incapacitated, under section 744.3201. The court then decides on capacity and on who should serve as guardian.

Can someone outside Florida be a guardian?

Only if related to the ward in a way section 744.309 lists, such as by blood or adoption, or the spouse of such a relative. Florida residents 18 or older may serve unless disqualified.

Who cannot be a guardian in Florida?

A person convicted of a felony, or one who cannot carry out the duties because of incapacity or illness or is otherwise unsuitable (section 744.309(3)).

What reports must a Florida guardian file?

An initial report within 60 days after letters are signed (section 744.362) and, for a guardian of the person, an annual guardianship plan within 90 days after the anniversary month (section 744.367).

What rights does a person under guardianship keep?

Among others, an annual review of the guardianship report and plan, continuing review of any restriction of rights and restoration to capacity at the earliest possible time (section 744.3215).

Which court handles cases in Melbourne?

State court cases in Brevard County are heard in Florida's Eighteenth Judicial Circuit.

Are there Spanish-speaking guardianship lawyers in Melbourne?

Yes. 1 of the 14 ranked lawyers lists Spanish on their Florida Bar profile. Each LexRanked profile shows the languages on record.

How is this ranking ordered?

By the LexRank score, calculated only from facts with a cited source: experience, practice-area relevance, awards on record such as board certification, professional credentials, data quality and location. Client reviews do not affect the LexRank score: neither star ratings nor the number of reviews is scored. Payment never changes a position.

Do client reviews affect the LexRank score?

Client reviews do not affect the LexRank score: neither star ratings nor the number of reviews is scored. Reviews are shown on profiles for information only, and Reputation counts only awards on record, such as board certification. How we rank

Which lawyers are verified?

14 of the 14 ranked lawyers have fully verified profiles: Charles Ian Nash, William Arthur Johnson, Robert Joseph Naberhaus III, David Conrad Netzley II “Dave” and Michelle Stein Spira “Michelle” and others.

What is the difference between the top two lawyers?

Charles Ian Nash scores 77.60 and William Arthur Johnson 77.33, a gap of 0.27 points, mostly in practice-area relevance. Compare them side by side

About this ranking

Last updated
Methodology
LexRank v1.2 - deterministic, reproducible scoring
Editorial review
LexRanked editorial team,
Independence
Positions are never sold. Paid placements, if any, are labelled and do not affect scores.

Explore